NCS3202: Gibbs Model- Reflective Activity Report- Clinical Governance Structures- Nursing Essay…

NCS3202: Gibbs Model- Reflective Activity Report- Clinical Governance Structures- Nursing Essay Writing Assignment

Task:

Introduction

State what the experience was, where it took place and how long it lasted. State that Gibbs’ model is being used (a diagram can be included, if desired, immediately after the Introduction or in the Appendix)

Content & Application of Critical Thinking

Description –this part is not analytical, it is descriptive, it describes an experience

1. Using specific and relevant detail, gives a concise description of one clinical prac. Experience (not a week or a month, just one experience during prac;)
2. Gives brief description of the clinical prac setting, including the clinical OR nursing governance structure.

Clinical governance structures are organisational structures, such as clinical audit committees, created for maintaining and improving the safety and quality, and the effectiveness and dependability, of services provided by a health service provider.

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia Governs registration and endorsement, standards, sets forth professional codes and guidelines.

1. States 4 learning objectives that were used for the week or time period within which the clinical experience/situation took place (prac 5 or other prac; if no prac, write 4 learning objectives)

Feelings –this part is not analytical, it is descriptive, it describes personal feelings and thoughts and actions (reactions)
Answers any of the following questions that are be relevant to the experience:
• How did you feel and what did you think prior to the experience?
• How did you feel and what did you think during the experience?
• How did you react during the experience?
• How did you feel and what did you think after the experience?

Evaluation –this part is not analytical, it makes positive and/or negative judgements about an experience
Answers any of the following questions are relevant to the experience:
• What went well during the experience (what worked)?
• What went badly during the experience (what did not work)?
• How did the experience end?Was the experience complete (was there a resolution) or incomplete?

Analysis –this part is analytical, it does not describe, it tries to explain the causes and consequences of things that happened, it asks questions like why, so what, and what if?

Does any of the following that the student thinks is relevant:

1. Reconsider the things that went badly and write why you think they went badly
2. Reconsider the things that went badly and write what you think this lead to (consequences of action).
3. Think about what could have been done to avoid these negative consequences.
4. Reconsider the things that went well and write why you think they went well (causes of action). Reconsider the things that went well and write what you think this lead to (consequences of action). Think about how this positive action could have been further improved
5. Think about your contribution to the experience and discuss how useful it was and why it was useful (did a previous experience help you? can you compare it to a previous experience?).
6. If you were unable to contribute to the experience, say why. Think about other people present during the experience and try to assess whether their reactions were similar or different to yours. Try to say why they were the same or different.

Conclusion —summary of what was learned, or what was not learned.

Reconsiders the experience and answer any of the following questions that are relevant:
• What should or could I have done differently?
• What stopped me from doing this?
• What did I learn about myself during the experience (positive and/or negative)?
• What did I learn about my current knowledge or level of practice (strengths and weaknesses)?
• Discusses if the experience achieved any of the Objectives (learning goals)?

If not met, why not? For example, not relevant for this clinical experience, met in another experience).

Action Plan

Answers any of the following questions that are relevant to making a plan:
• What do I need to do in order to be better prepared to face this experience in future?
• Even if the experience was positive and I did well, in which areas can I improve?
• What are the priority areas that need to be developed?
• What specific steps do I need to take in order to achieve these improvements?

Conclusion

The Conclusion should not be a repetition of the Conclusion in stage 5 of the model. Instead, it could briefly address any of the following questions:

1. How valuable was the reflective tool in identifying your strengths and weaknesses and improving your practice or knowledge?
2. Was Gibbs’ model easy to use?
3. Do you now understand the value of reflective learning and of using a reflective learning model like Gibbs’ model?